Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42879049›Full record

ReviewIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2026

Why do we believe in fairies?

Alla Buravlova

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alla BuravlovaDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 60 Volodymyrska Street, Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine. accojib17@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the cognitive and neurobiological mechanisms underlying the transformation of the fairy figure: from a dangerous entity in medieval folklore to an aestheticized symbol of digital culture. The central research question addresses why the aesthetic appeal of a mythological image increases its subjective plausibility and how this process contributes to the long-term evolution of folkloric representations. Drawing on a narrative review covering three key periods - the medieval era, the Victorian period, and the digital age - the study proposes that this transformation can be explained through the interaction of three mechanisms: an evolutionary mechanism (the Hyperactive Agency Detection Device, HADD), a neuroaesthetic mechanism (activation of reward-related neural systems in response to attractive stimuli), and a psychological mechanism (escapism as a coping strategy). The analysis suggests that in medieval culture, the fairy functioned as a cognitive tool for structuring threat and explaining unpredictable events. During the Victorian era, under the influence of escapism and the commercialization of folklore, the image underwent aestheticization: its miniaturization and increased visual appeal reduced perceived threat. In the digital age, this process has been reinforced through aesthetics such as Cottagecore and Fairycore, where the fairy figure serves a psychological regulatory function in the context of urbanization and information overload. Based on these findings, the paper proposes a preliminary cognitive model of mythological transformation, describing a progression from HADD activation, through the halo effect, to the engagement of dopaminergic reward systems.

Indexed as

EstheticsFolkloreMythologyHistory, MedievalHumansCognitive copingEscapismFairy folkloreHADDMythological aestheticsNeuroaesthetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.