Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42878998›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026

The Visual Impact of Uncorrected Astigmatism in Eyes Fitted with Dual Focus Myopia Control Lenses.

Dawn Meyer, Matt Jaskulski, Martin Rickert, Myhanh Nguyen, Paul Chamberlain, Arthur Bradley, Pete Kollbaum

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dawn MeyerIndiana University School of Optometry, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5157-2557
Matt JaskulskiIndiana University School of Optometry, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5824-7135
Martin RickertIndiana University School of Optometry, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7010-7300
Myhanh NguyenCooperVision, Inc, San Ramon, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0222-1021
Paul ChamberlainCooperVision, Inc, San Ramon, California, USA.
Arthur BradleyCooperVision, Inc, San Ramon, California, USA.
Pete KollbaumIndiana University School of Optometry, Bloomington, Indiana, USA. kollbaum@iu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9568-2064

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo quantify the impact of uncorrected astigmatism in myopic eyes fitted with dual focus (DF) myopia control contact lenses.

methodsThe right eyes of 10 young adult myopes were corrected with standard single vision (SV, Proclear 1 day, CooperVision, Inc.) and DF (MiSight 1 day, CooperVision, Inc.) contact lenses. SV and DF contact lens powers were determined from SV over-refractions and any ocular astigmatism was corrected using cylindrical trial lenses. Visual acuity and subjective vision were measured through added cylindrical trial lenses (0.00DC, 0.75DC, 1.25DC, 1.75DC and 2.25DC) with spherical equivalent adjustments. With the 2.25D astigmatic lenses, spherical trial lenses were also used to focus the front edge, centre and back edge of the interval of Sturm. Data were analysed using linear mixed-effects regression models.

resultsHigh illumination visual acuity was similar for both lens types (zero astigmatism model-estimated intercept: -0.25 logMAR for SV; -0.24 logMAR for DF), and visual acuity decreased linearly with increasing astigmatism, similarly with both SV (0.27 logMAR/D) and DF (0.23 logMAR/D) lenses. Under low room illumination and in the absence of astigmatism, SV acuity was slightly superior to DF (mean logMAR -0.03 and +0.06 for SV and DF, respectively) and the rate of visual acuity decline with increasing astigmatism was less for DF (0.21 logMAR/D) than for SV lenses (0.26 logMAR/D; p = 0.04). Subjective quality of vision ratings were higher for SV lenses compared to DF lenses (model-estimated intercept: 93 vs. 86). Quality of vision ratings decreased linearly with increasing astigmatism at nearly identical rates for both lens types (~19 rating units/D). LogMAR acuity and subjective ratings were similar when the edges or the centre of the interval of Sturm were focused.

conclusionUncorrected astigmatism had an almost identical impact on visual acuity and vision quality in eyes fitted with DF myopia control and SV contact lenses.

Indexed as

AstigmatismMyopiaOpticsVisual acuity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.