ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026
Improved diffusion tensor parametric maps in the brain from reduced-direction acquisitions using a deep learning approach.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study implements and evaluates a deep learning approach to enhance FA, MD, AD, and RD maps derived from 16-direction DTI to approximate corresponding maps derived from 32-direction DTI, with the aim of reducing acquisition time while maintaining quantitative accuracy. MATERIALS AND
methodsA modified 8-layer 3D convolutional neural network was trained using scalar DTI-derived maps from 16-direction acquisitions as input and corresponding 32-direction maps as reference targets. Model performance was evaluated on an independently acquired evaluation cohort (n=33) using PSNR, %NRMSE, SSIM, Bland-Altman analysis, and tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS), with BM4D and AONLM as comparators.
resultsThe DL model reduced noise and improved PSNR, %NRMSE, and SSIM compared with raw ND16, BM4D, and AONLM (p < 0.05). DL-derived FA, MD, and AD showed the smallest deviations from the ND32 reference among the evaluated methods, although statistically significant mean differences remained. TBSS showed localized differences for FA and AD, but no significant differences for MD or RD (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION: The proposed map-domain DL approach improved scalar DTI-derived maps from 16-direction acquisitions while reducing diffusion acquisition time by approximately 1.8-fold. The findings demonstrate improved agreement with 32-direction reference maps, while remaining quantitative differences and generalizability require further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42878971What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.