ReviewJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2026
Increasing mobility while in hospital after hip fracture: even the best evidence may not translate to all national health services.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hip fracture rehabilitation is strongly influenced by the healthcare system in which postoperative care is delivered. The WHiTE 15: INITIATE trial represents an important pragmatic attempt to determine whether increasing the frequency and duration of in-hospital physiotherapy after hip fracture improves days at home within 30 days of admission. However, the transferability of such evidence to the Italian National Health System is limited by structural, regulatory and sociocultural factors. Italy has one of the oldest populations in Europe, a high annual burden of proximal femoral fractures, a limited public physiotherapy workforce capacity and a care model in which transfer to inpatient rehabilitation facilities is frequently shaped by patient and family preferences rather than clinical indication alone. Current evidence supports early mobilisation and structured rehabilitation, but it does not establish that a single discharge pathway is universally superior across all healthcare systems. In Italy, direct discharge home is often constrained by insufficient community-based rehabilitation services and strong expectations for post-acute institutional care. Therefore, intensifying in-hospital physiotherapy alone may not increase the number of days at home unless discharge preferences, family support and community rehabilitation capacity are addressed simultaneously. Future research should evaluate Italian-specific discharge pathways, psychosocial determinants of rehabilitation preferences, cost-effectiveness of supported discharge models and policy strategies that align rehabilitation intensity with clinical need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42878961What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.