Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42878958›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026

A Meta-Analysis on Outcomes of Zanidatamab Plus Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced HER2-positive Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Henrique Jin Son Kim, Murilo Lauria Freire Ribeiro, Leonardo Gil-Santana, Guilherme Rossato de Almeida, Angelo Borsarelli Carvalho Brito, Tiago Cordeiro Felismino

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Henrique Jin Son KimDivision of Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, 211 Professor Antônio Prudente, Liberdade, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Murilo Lauria Freire RibeiroDivision of Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, 211 Professor Antônio Prudente, Liberdade, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Leonardo Gil-SantanaDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Guilherme Rossato de AlmeidaDivision of Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, 211 Professor Antônio Prudente, Liberdade, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Angelo Borsarelli Carvalho BritoDivision of Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, 211 Professor Antônio Prudente, Liberdade, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Tiago Cordeiro FelisminoDivision of Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, 211 Professor Antônio Prudente, Liberdade, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. tiago.felismino@accamargo.org.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZanidatamab is a novel HER2-targeted antibody that binds to two non-overlapping extracellular domains of the HER2 receptor. Early-phase trials have shown clinical benefit of first-line Zanidatamab in patients with advanced HER2-positive esophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zanidatamab in this patient population.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ASCO, and ESMO databases for studies examining zanidatamab as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-positive advanced GEA. Outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS); objective response rate (ORR); disease control rate (DCR); duration of response (DOR); and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Analyses were presented as median or proportions in percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Random-effect models were used for analysis, which were carried out using R software (v4.5.2).

resultsThree clinical trials involving 685 patients with advanced HER2-positive GEA treated with zanidatamab in combination with chemotherapy and/or tislelizumab were included. Overall, the reconstructed pooled median OS was 26.05 months (95% CI: 23.60-30.04), while the pooled median PFS was 12.61 months (95% CI: 11.05-14.60). The pooled ORR was 70% (95% CI, 67-74), DCR was 96% (95% CI, 78-100), and median DOR was 17.11 months (95% CI, 13.07-22.40). Treatment-related diarrhea leading to dose reduction was observed in 16% (95% CI, 1%-75%) of patients. Treatment discontinuation due to any cause rate was 20% (95% CI, 3%-44%). Serious treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 66% (95% CI, 50%-81%) of patients. Common any-grade AEs included diarrhea (89%; 95% CI, 75%-98%), nausea (60%; 95% CI, 45%-74%), and infusion-related reactions (30%; 95% CI, 19%-43%). Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea, nausea, and treatment-related AEs rates were as follows: 26% (95% CI, 19%-34%), 5% (95% CI, 2%-13%), and 65% (95% CI, 58%-71%), respectively. Other important AEs include immune-mediated AEs (25% incidence rate), left ventricular dysfunction (6% incidence rate), and non-infectious pulmonary toxicity (4% incidence rate).

conclusionsOur pooled analyses suggest that zanidatamab exhibits meaningful activity as first-line treatment of advanced HER2-positive GEA. Yet, concerning toxicity rates were also consistently reported across studies. Future randomized studies are needed to further explore its activity and safety profile in this population.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEsophageal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsAntibodies, BispecificEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleHumansProgression-Free SurvivalTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, BispecificERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinaseszanidatamabEsophageal neoplasmsGastroesophageal junctionHER2-positiveStomach neoplasmsZanidatamab

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.