Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42878939›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2026

In-vivo CRISPR/Base-Editing "One-Shot" Therapies Targeting PCSK9.

Benjamin Nelson, Amit Khera

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin NelsonDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Amit KheraDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Amit.khera@utsouthwestern.edu.

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS 4R33HL161753-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo assess and present the current state of gene editing for reduction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) with emphasis on technology and ongoing trials for genetic editing of protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). RECENT

findingsThere are two ongoing clinical trials in humans to edit PCSK9 using CRISPR-Cas9 base editing technology packaged within lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). Preliminary interim and preclinical data suggest that this strategy is effective for long-term reduction of PCSK9 and LDL-C following a single IV infusion. Monoclonal antibodies that neutralize circulating PCSK9 have demonstrated the utility of PCSK9 inhibition for reducing LDL-C and ASCVD. Although there is an increasing number of pharmacologic strategies for inhibiting PCSK9, gene editing is an attractive option due to its potential to permanently reduce circulating PCSK9 levels and by extension LDL-C and ASCVD. There are two ongoing clinical trials in humans investigating the safety and efficacy of gene editing for PCSK9 with encouraging preliminary results. In this review, we will describe the background of PCSK9 as a target, the gene editing machinery and the preliminary results. We also explore the unique safety challenges of this technology and propose considerations for appropriate patient populations to maintain net positive benefits despite unknowns.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic TherapyProprotein Convertase 9AnimalsCholesterol, LDLHumansPCSK9 InhibitorsCholesterol, LDLPCSK9 InhibitorsPCSK9 protein, humanProprotein Convertase 9Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) riskCRISPR-Cas9Gene editingLow-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)Protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.