ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
Cell-free DNA methylation markers in the diagnosis of hepatitis B virus-related- hepatocellular carcinoma: a review.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV-HCC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and its prognosis largely depends on detection at an early, potentially curable stage. However, current surveillance strategies based on ultrasonography and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) have limited sensitivity, highlighting the need for more accurate and non-invasive biomarkers. This review examines the emerging role of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation analysis as a liquid biopsy approach for the early detection and surveillance of HBV-HCC. Aberrant DNA methylation is a major epigenetic event in hepatocarcinogenesis, contributing to the silencing of tumor suppressor genes, while the HBV X protein can further promote methylation dysregulation through its interactions with DNA methyltransferases. Clinically, specific cfDNA methylation markers and multi-feature panels have demonstrated promising diagnostic performance for HCC detection. More complex multi-feature cfDNA models integrating methylation with additional fragmentomic features have achieved up to 95.42% sensitivity and 97.67% specificity (AUC = 0.997) for differentiating HCC from liver cirrhosis, while maintaining a high sensitivity of 90.0% for early-stage HCC detection. In specific cohorts, methylation-based approaches have complemented AFP, detecting nearly 75% of early malignancies missed by AFP alone and increasing the AUC of combined predictive model from 0.87 to 0.90. Furthermore, combined mutation-methylation assays that concurrently profile genetic mutations and hypermethylation patterns have achieved validation AUC values as high as 0.93. Overall, cfDNA methylation-based approaches exhibit promising diagnostic performance compared with conventional biomarkers in specific cohorts. However, prospective validation and direct head-to-head comparisons with existing surveillance strategies are still required before their clinical utility can be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42878936What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.