ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026
Feasibility of automated registration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for inguinal hernia surgery : a single-centre pilot study.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNational registries have the potential to improve quality of inguinal hernia surgery by monitoring provided care and comparing outcomes. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential for assessing quality as they capture key outcomes directly from the patient's perspective. This pilot study evaluated feasibility of automated PROMs registration up to 2 years postoperatively with minimal administrative burden in a high-volume hernia clinic.
methodsAdults who underwent elective inguinal hernia repair and received PROMs questionnaires between January 18, 2023, and August 25, 2025, were prospectively included. Patients received secure email invitations to complete questionnaires through the hospital's patient portal at baseline and at 6-8 weeks (short-term), 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. PROMs included pain, functional recovery, satisfaction, and hernia recurrence. The primary outcome was the response rate at different follow-up time points (target rate: 60%). Key secondary outcomes included physician-assisted response rates and responder versus non-responder differences.
resultsA total of 3,628 patients were included. Preoperative and short-term response rates were 77.7% and 63.2%, respectively. Postoperative response rates declined to 47.7% (3 months), 44.2% (1 year), and 43.8% (2 years). Younger age and a higher burden of comorbidities were associated with non-response.
conclusionThis study demonstrated feasibility of automated PROMs at baseline and short-term follow-up, but highlights the challenge of declining response rates over time and representativeness of the responding population. Integrating this approach into a national registry could improve data collection and overall efficiency. Strategies to optimize response rates and representativeness should be explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42878913What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.