ReviewOecologia2026
Threat-induced neural prioritization: a life history framework for energy allocation under chronic predator stress.
Review in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whereas acute stress responses support immediate escape from transient threats, persistent or repeated predation risk (hereafter referred to as chronic predation risk) requires organisms to continually reallocate limited energetic resources among competing physiological demands. Classical stress physiology emphasizes acute "fight-or-flight" responses that transiently mobilize glucose and lipids to skeletal muscle, whereas life‑history and allostatic‑load frameworks highlight long‑term trade-offs between survival, growth, and reproduction. Yet these perspectives rarely specify how energy is redistributed among tissues under persistent threat. Here, we synthesize life-history theory, stress physiology, evolutionary medicine, and recent experimental work in a predator-exposed Drosophila melanogaster model to propose Threat-Induced Neural Prioritization (TINP), a conceptual framework describing how persistent predation risk induces tissue-specific metabolic reorganization that preferentially allocates energetic resources to neural and glial tissues. This reprogramming supports energetically costly processes such as memory consolidation and decision‑making that enhance survival, but reduces investment in peripheral homeostasis and can shade into pathology under environmental mismatch. We outline testable predictions about tissue‑specific substrate use, developmental timing, and taxonomic generality of TINP, and argue that explicitly treating cognition as a life‑history trait clarifies how chronic ecological threats shape both metabolic organization and evolutionary trajectories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42878895What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.