ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2026
Overtriage of a physician-staffed prehospital emergency resource in Austria : An exploratory retrospective analysis.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAppropriate emergency medical dispatch aims to balance rapid deployment of physician-staffed emergency medical services against unnecessary utilization of limited prehospital resources. Data on physician dispatch appropriateness in Austrian emergency medical services remain scarce. This study evaluated overtriage of a physician-staffed emergency medical response vehicle in Lower Austria. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis single-center retrospective study included all primary dispatches of a physician-staffed emergency medical response vehicle between January and December 2022. Dispatches were retrospectively classified as appropriately triaged or overtriaged based on predefined criteria. Secondary objectives were overtriage across the 10 most frequent dispatch codes and the association between priority level and dispatch appropriateness.
resultsOverall, 3454 primary dispatches were analyzed and 2629 dispatches were classified as overtriage (76.1%; 95% confidence interval, CI 74.7-77.5%). Of these, 38.4% represented dispatches without patient contact and 37.7% were classified as low acuity overtriage, while only 23.9% (95% CI 22.5-25.3%) were retrospectively classified as appropriately triaged. The 10 most frequent dispatch codes accounted for 41.8% of all dispatches and demonstrated a combined overtriage rate of 77.1% (95% CI 74.8-79.2%). Priority level was not associated with physician dispatch appropriateness (ρ = -0.002, p = 0.92).
conclusionIn this study, over three quarters of physician-staffed emergency medical service dispatches did not meet the predefined retrospective criteria for physician involvement, although about half of these overtriaged cases were cancelled before physician-patient contact. Among cases with patient contact, 61% did not meet the predefined criteria for physician-level care. These findings highlight substantial potential to refine emergency physician-dispatch criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42878817What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.