ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Quantitative assessment of fibroelastosis reveals distinct elastic and collagen fiber patterns in idiopathic and secondary pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is a rare idiopathic interstitial lung disease; however, similar histopathological features are also observed in secondary PPFE (SPPFE) and in non-PPFE entities. This study aimed to distinguish idiopathic PPFE (IPPFE), SPPFE, and non-PPFE by quantitatively assessing elastic and collagen fibers using a deep learning-based approach. We analyzed 1728 Elastica van Gieson-stained slides obtained from 174 explanted lungs, including IPPFE (n = 14), SPPFE (n = 34), and non-PPFE (n = 126). Elastic and collagen fiber areas were quantified using DenseNet. Elastic fibers were classified into dense and faint types and assessed in upper and lower lobes. In the upper lobes, IPPFE showed a lower median collagen fiber area/fibrosis area ratio (0.480) than SPPFE (0.555, P = 0.0197) and non-PPFE (0.611, P < 0.0001), while SPPFE also showed a lower ratio than non-PPFE (P = 0.0063). IPPFE and SPPFE showed higher median dense elastic fiber area/fibrosis area ratios (0.117 and 0.097, respectively) than non-PPFE (0.041; P < 0.0001 for both). Likewise, IPPFE and SPPFE showed higher median faint elastic fiber area/fibrosis area ratios (0.385 and 0.342, respectively) than non-PPFE (0.295; P = 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Similar trends were observed in the lower lobes, although differences in collagen fiber area/fibrosis area ratios were less pronounced. In conclusion, fibroelastosis in IPPFE is characterized by a uniform, dense elastic fiber framework with faint elastic fibers, whereas SPPFE shows heterogeneous fibroelastosis with mixed collagen fibers. These findings confirm that IPPFE is a distinct condition from SPPFE and non-PPFE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42878800What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.