ArticlePsychopharmacology2026
Sex-specific exploration patterns and noradrenergic modulation in object recognition memory: Role of the perirhinal cortex.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionObject recognition memory (ORM) relies on two processes: familiarity, mediated by the perirhinal cortex (PRH), and recollection, supported by the hippocampus (HIP). These processes are recruited depending on memory strength: brief exploration forms weak traces relying on PRH familiarity, whereas extended exploration produces strong traces requiring HIP recollection. Noradrenaline (NA) modulates these mechanisms via β2-adrenergic receptors (β2-AR), influencing memory strength and consolidation. However, whether this modulation differs between sexes under conditions generating weak versus strong memory traces remains unknown. We examined how NA and β2-AR influence ORM in male and female mice under these conditions.
methodsSwiss mice were tested in the Novel Object Recognition task using training durations of 1-10 min and delays of 24-48 h. Atomoxetine (ATO) was used to increase NA levels, and ICI-118,551 (ICI) to block β2-AR. Neural activation was assessed via c-Fos immunohistochemistry in PRH and HIP.
resultsFemales showed greater efficiency in object processing, requiring less exploration than males. Under weak training conditions, ATO facilitated the formation of long-term ORM in females but not in males, accompanied by increased PRH c-Fos expression without HIP involvement. β2-AR blockade impaired ORM acquisition only in females, with no significant changes in c-Fos. In males, performance depended on object dissimilarity; increased NA did not enhance ORM unless stimuli were highly distinct.
conclusionsThese findings reveal sex differences in noradrenergic modulation of ORM. In females, NA acting via β2-AR supports memory formation through PRH-dependent familiarity, emphasizing the importance of sex as a biological variable in research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42878799What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.