ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2027
A Uniquome-Based Method for Proteins Identification by Mass Spectrometry.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein identification by mass spectrometry (MS) is a pivotal step in proteomics. Numerous methods have been developed to securely and effectively identify proteins derived from experimentally detected peptides by mass spectrometry. The dominant approach is based on the assumption that each experimentally identified peptide can be matched with a peptide included in a database of peptide sequences, generated by in silico digestion of proteins with a specific proteolytic enzyme. In this way, the protein containing the peptide can be identified. In a more advanced approach, the proteins and their in silico-digested peptides in the database are transformed into theoretical mass spectrometry spectra, and search engines match the experimentally obtained spectra to these theoretical spectra generated from protein and peptide sequences. We developed an alternative method for protein identification using Core Unique Peptides (CrUPs) and the Uniquome, termed as Uniquome-Based Protein Identification Method (UB-PIM). According to this method, instead of searching for peptides in the database of in silico-digested peptides, we search for CrUPs within the experimentally obtained peptides by mass spectrometry. If a peptide contains at least one CrUP, it can be directly correlated to the protein from which the CrUP is derived. Because of the unique nature of CrUPs, peptides obtained by MS can securely and uniquely identify the protein of origin. This provides a reference space in which even single-peptide identifications can achieve high specificity, reducing the ambiguity caused by shared or homologous sequences and improving the interpretability of MS data. Furthermore, UB-PIM can be applied to any type of peptide and is effective with both Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) and Data-Dependent Acquisition (DDA) approaches, as well as with top-down and bottom-up proteomics. This allows confident protein identification from minimal evidence, expands the scope of detectable proteins, and remains computationally efficient, rapid, and universally applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42878757What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.