ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2027
Standardized Annotation of Quantitative Proteomics Datasets Using SDRF-Proteomics.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteomics datasets require detailed and standardized metadata annotation to ensure reproducibility, reusability, and alignment with FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles. This chapter presents a practical, hands-on workflow for annotating a label-free proteomics dataset using the Sample and Data Relationship Format for Proteomics (SDRF-Proteomics), a HUPO-PSI and EuBIC-MS standard that has been adopted by major proteomics data repositories. We demonstrate the process on a COVID-19 nasal-swab dataset (PXD020394), showing how to derive sample and assay metadata from the study files, encode them in SDRF with the lesSDRF web application, and validate the result. Although the worked example is label-free, the approach can be generalized to other quantification strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42878753What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.