ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Optimized Cardiorespiratory State at Tone Onset Enhances Sensory Responses but Not Associative Learning in Healthy Adults.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies suggest that when a tone-conditioned stimulus (CS) predicting an airpuff towards the eye is presented at diastole during expiration, both sensory responses to the CS and trace eyeblink conditioning (TEBC) are enhanced. However, not all participants learn and individual variation in the body-brain relationship remains overlooked. We studied whether timing the CS based on an individually optimized bodily state enhances sensory responses and TEBC. We assumed so, as sensory response magnitude reflects attention and stimulus salience: A salient CS should facilitate TEBC. Forty-one young adults and 19 older adults completed a passive auditory task while electrocardiogram, respiration and electroencephalogram were recorded. The cardiorespiratory state associated with the largest N1-P2 response was identified individually. Optimal states varied across participants and did not differ between age groups. Participants underwent TEBC at their optimal state (Personalized) or at diastole during expiration (Control). As expected, the CS evoked a larger N1-P2 response in the Personalized than the Control group. However, conditioned responding, peak performance, and learning rate, or the proportion of good learners did not differ between groups. Older adults learned more slowly, made fewer conditioned responses, and were less aware of the tone-airpuff association than young adults. These findings tentatively suggest that enhancing early sensory processing of the CS may not improve TEBC, although the low reliability of the individually determined optimal state limits this conclusion. Future studies should examine whether timing external stimuli to specific bodily states effectively influences behaviour in tasks that rely on rapid sensory processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.