ArticleJournal of vision2026
Anisotropic speed discrimination sensitivity for expanding and contracting optic flow.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinal optic flow provides critical visual cues for locomotion and self-navigation. Forward self-motion, such as walking or driving, typically induces an expanding radial flow pattern on the retina. Despite the predominance of expanding optic flow in everyday self-motion, several studies have reported higher sensitivity for contracting flow that arises under relatively rare conditions, such as walking backward or falling onto one's back. The underlying basis of this anisotropy remains elusive. In this study, we compared discrimination sensitivity to speed for expanding versus contracting optic flow, given that speed is a fundamental attribute of motion and that sensitivity to it provides insight into underlying visual mechanisms. We found that sensitivity in speed discrimination was comparable between expansion and contraction at low and high speeds but was significantly higher for contraction at an intermediate speed corresponding to ecologically relevant self-motion, such as walking. This anisotropic pattern was observed for both two-dimensional planar (Experiment 1) and simulated three-dimensional (Experiment 2) optic flow stimuli. Together, these findings suggest that anisotropic speed discrimination sensitivity to expanding and contracting optic flow at ecologically typical egomotion speeds may reflect an adaptive visual mechanism that supports postural stability and balance during relatively rare backward self-motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.