Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42878576›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Linking visual span and reading speed in dyslexia.

Nilsu Atilgan, Ben D Sawyer, Gordon E Legge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nilsu AtilganDepartment of Psychology, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ben D SawyerDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Gordon E LeggeDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

PSYCHOPHYSICS OF READING: NORMAL AND LOW VISIONR01EY002934 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LEGGE, GORDON E · 1985 to 2018
$5.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines visual processing in dyslexia using a psychophysical measure linked to reading speed, the visual span, defined as the number of letters reliably identified within a single fixation. We asked whether reduced visual span is associated with slower reading in dyslexia. In a laboratory study, adults with dyslexia and typical readers completed standardized assessments, reading speed, and visual span measurements. Individuals with dyslexia showed significantly slower reading speeds and narrower visual span profiles than typical readers. Visual span size was positively correlated with reading speed across participants. The paradigm was then adapted for online testing. In a validation study with typical readers, online visual span and reading speed test showed patterns consistent with laboratory patterns, including a strong positive relationship between visual span size and reading speed. Applying this paradigm to a larger online sample of individuals with self-reported dyslexia revealed markedly slower reading speeds, reduced visual span sizes, and a robust correlation between visual span and reading speed despite substantial individual variability. Together, these findings provide the first direct evidence that reduced visual span is a reliable characteristic of dyslexia and is closely linked to reading performance. Moreover, they demonstrate that a brief, psychophysically grounded visual span assessment can be implemented reliably online, enabling scalable investigation of visual factors in dyslexia across diverse populations.

Indexed as

DyslexiaPattern Recognition, VisualReadingVisual PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMalePsychophysicsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42878576
PMCPMC13676239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.