ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Physical Parameters Influencing the Rate of Subretinal Injection: A Microfluidic Analysis.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physical Parameters Influencing the Rate of Subretinal Injection: A Microfluidic Analysis.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Subretinal injection during vitrectomy has become an important technique owing to the growing number of cell and gene therapy trials for retinal disease. Reducing the injection rate can mitigate trauma or shear forces on the retinal pigment epithelium, yet many surgeons alter the subretinal injection system in ways that could influence this rate. Methods: We created a theoretical model of a standard subretinal injection system by applying the Hagen-Poiseuille equation, assuming steady, incompressible, laminar flow of a water-like Newtonian fluid. The system consisted of the vitrectomy console, plastic tubing, the MedOne Microdose kit, and the MedOne 38G/41G subretinal cannula set. Results: This model generated an open-access web app allowing user modification of parameters including cannula length and diameter, beveling, viscosity, console injection pressure, and intraocular pressure. The internal diameter of the cannula had the most prominent effect on flow, with small increases producing large increases in flow. Increasing console pressure linearly increased tip flow. Trimming the tip by 3 mm modestly increased flow by 18%, whereas beveling the tip or altering intraocular pressure produced negligible changes. Conclusions: With this theoretical model, we were able to identify key parameters that influence the rate of subretinal injection, thus providing important guidance for surgeons. Translational Relevance: This open-access web application enables vitreoretinal surgeons and gene- and cell-therapy trialists to assess how modifications to the subretinal injection system alter flow at the cannula tip, supporting standardized and reproducible delivery that minimizes flow-related trauma to the outer retina.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.