Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42878357›Full record

ArticlePhysiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy2026

Professional Change and Identity in Contemporary Physiotherapy: A Six-Domain Conceptual Framework.

Dimitrios Stasinopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dimitrios StasinopoulosDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health and Caring Sciences, Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8498-9343

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeContemporary physiotherapy is often described as evidence-informed, person-centered, and biopsychosocial. These descriptions can imply a break with earlier practice, although some commitments have longer histories. This paper proposes a framework for examining professional change and its implications for professional identity.

methodsThis single-author conceptual analysis draws on a purposive reading of historical, sociological, critical, and professional literature. The professional maturation hypothesis is a working proposition: change may strengthen an enduring commitment or alter a foundational assumption. Contrasting examples inform six provisional domains; we did not conduct a systematic review or empirical validation.

resultsThe domains are understanding of the body and health, knowledge, professional role, therapeutic relationships, therapeutic purpose, and organization of care. Within each domain, the framework distinguishes maturation (better evidence or enactment), consolidation (institutional support), rebranding (new language without demonstrated substantive change), and rupture (a consequential shift in foundational assumptions). These interpretations may coexist. DISCUSSION: The framework helps clinicians, educators, researchers, and professional organizations assess what has changed, where, to what extent, and with what consequences. Its intended use is context-specific reflection and cross-national inquiry, not classification of countries along a universal trajectory. The framework remains provisional and unvalidated.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesPhysical Therapy SpecialtyProfessional RoleHumansphysiotherapyprofessional changeprofessional developmentprofessional identity

Identifiers

PMID42878357
PMCPMC13670981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.