SynthesisMedical education online2026
Telehealth-related education and training: a systematic review of recent developments since the COVID-19 pandemic.
Synthesis in Medical education online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pandemic showed the potential of existing telehealth to increase healthcare access but also the need for healthcare workers to be competent and skilled in delivering care through this modality. We undertook a systematic literature review to identify telehealth-related courses developed since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and summarised study characteristics, learning objectives, and course content. Articles describing telehealth-related training and education programs implemented between 2020 and 2024 were included. Papers were required to list specific program content or learning objectives for any educational level or type of health professional. Two authors independently extracted data. Quality of articles was assessed against the SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines. Quantitative data was summarised and reported using frequencies and percentages, learning objectives were mapped across the six Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) telehealth competency domains, and qualitative categories were thematically synthesised. Of 7547 articles identified, 51 were included. Most courses were implemented in the USA (82%), mostly targeted to undergraduate students (51%), and the number of articles per year increased over time. Most courses were developed by universities (53%), sometimes in collaboration with health services, and content was primarily applicable across multiple specialties. Participants nearly always evaluated the courses (90%). Content included basic knowledge and skills in telehealth, patient safety, and ethics, with learning objectives often on technology and communication. Only four programs included all AAMC telehealth competencies. This review highlights that telehealth education and training has expanded since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, however, current curricula are lacking experiential learning. Courses generally covered telehealth communication competencies in detail, but more content on the ethical and legal requirements, billing, physical examination, patient education, and eligibility for telehealth is required. For efficient resource use, standardised training can be applied across disciplines with addition of site or speciality-specific modules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.