Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42878265›Full record

ArticleChemistry & biodiversity2026

Biological Activities and Phytochemical Composition of Arum rupicola var. rupicola: An In Vitro and In Silico Study.

Selim Can Kamalak, Ela Nur Şimşek Sezer, Erdoğan Güneş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry & biodiversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Selim Can KamalakDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Selçuk University, Konya, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3923-9261
Ela Nur Şimşek SezerDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Selçuk University, Konya, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2805-7204
Erdoğan GüneşDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Selçuk University, Konya, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2833-5710

Funding

Selçuk University, Research Foundation 24201064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phytochemical composition and biological activities of extracts obtained from the aerial parts (ARA), fruits (ARF), and rhizomes (ARR) of Arum rupicola var. rupicola (Araceae) were investigated using in vitro and in silico approaches. Phenolic and volatile profiles were characterized by HPLC and GC/MS. Antioxidant (DPPH), antimicrobial (MIC), and cytotoxic (MTT) activities were evaluated. Molecular docking, MM-GBSA, and ADME analyses were performed using Schrödinger Maestro. HPLC revealed that rutin (35,001 µg/mL) and coumaric acid (13,145 µg/mL) were the dominant phenolics in ARA, while quercetin (18,256 µg/mL) predominated in ARF. ARA showed the strongest cytotoxic activity against HL-60 cells with an IC

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntioxidantsPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsBacillus cereusBiphenyl CompoundsFruitHL-60 CellsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular Docking SimulationPicratesPlant Components, AerialStructure-Activity RelationshipAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntioxidantsBiphenyl CompoundsPhytochemicalsPicratesPlant ExtractsADMEAraceaebiological activitymolecular dockingnatural productsrutin

Identifiers

PMID42878265
PMCPMC13670403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.