ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
CYP2D6-Guided Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain: A Multi-Center Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analgesic effectiveness of several opioids depends on CYP2D6-mediated metabolism to more active opioid receptor agonists. CYP2D6 activity is impacted by genetic variability and medications that inhibit CYP2D6. We conducted a pragmatic, multi-center, randomized, controlled trial to determine whether CYP2D6-guided opioid prescribing improves chronic pain. Participants were adults recruited from primary care or pain specialty clinics with at least 3 months of chronic pain treated or considered for treatment with tramadol, hydrocodone, or codeine. Participants were randomized to the usual care or CYP2D6-guided arm, in which CYP2D6 pharmacogenetic testing was performed. Healthcare professionals were recommended to avoid tramadol, hydrocodone, or codeine in patients with CYP2D6 intermediate or poor or ultra-rapid (for safety) metabolizer phenotypes based on either genotype or drug interactions. The primary outcome was the change in composite pain intensity scores from baseline to 3 months. Of 1048 enrolled participants, 282 had an actionable CYP2D6 phenotype. In this group, CYP2D6-guided recommendations did not improve the change in composite pain intensity scores from baseline to 3 months compared with usual care (mean [SD] -0.8 [2.4] vs. -0.7 [2.3]) or improve drug-gene concordance (26.8% vs. 27.1%) in the CYP2D6-guided versus usual care arm, respectively. In an exploratory analysis, participants whose therapy changed to align with their CYP2D6 phenotype had significantly improved pain scores. In conclusion, incorporating CYP2D6-guided recommendations for opioid therapy into routine practice did not change prescribing sufficiently to assess its impact on chronic pain control, suggesting that EHR-integrated CYP2D6 guidance is insufficient to change opioid prescribing for chronic pain.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.