Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42878206›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

'That Essence of Empowerment': An Exploration of People Living With Mental Illness', Healthcare Professionals', and Researchers' Experiences of Co-Design.

Catherine O'Donnell, Oliver Ardill-Young, Jacqueline Huber, Aaron Schokman, Philip B Ward, Jackie Curtis, Alyssa Milton, Scott Teasdale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Catherine O'DonnellMindgardens Neuroscience Network, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Oliver Ardill-YoungMindgardens Neuroscience Network, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7983-6999
Jacqueline HuberSt Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7925-1862
Aaron SchokmanSydney School of Medicine (Central Clinical School), The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0419-9347
Philip B WardDiscipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5779-7722
Jackie CurtisMindgardens Neuroscience Network, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6884-0098
Alyssa MiltonSydney School of Medicine (Central Clinical School), The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Scott TeasdaleMindgardens Neuroscience Network, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6769-8421

Funding

Australian Research Council CE200100025Medical Research Future Fund MRF2032279National Health and Medical Research CouncilUniversity of New South Wales GNT2025098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCo-design is commonly adopted as a methodology within mental health research. However, little is known about the experiences of people involved in co-design. We aimed to describe how a recent co-design process was enacted, exploring experiences of this and how power was manifested through this process.

methodsTwo workshops, seven focus groups, and a structured power reflection were conducted as part of an iterative co-design process involving people living with mental illness experiencing food insecurity (n = 9), mental healthcare professionals, including peer workers (n = 11), and researchers (n = 4). These took place in Sydney, Australia, between March 2023 and February 2024. Experiences of co-design were explored using a mixed-methods survey following workshops and qualitative enquiry during focus groups.

resultsThree analytic categories were constructed, relating to 'doing' co-design, the experience of co-design and the impacts of co-design, comprising 12 interpretative themes. The development of strong relationships, through the diversity of collaboration and open communication, was perceived as contributing to the impact of overall positive experiences and personal growth. Challenges centred around managing expectations of the uncertain process and perceptions regarding power imbalances. Co-design was also seen as having flow-on effects on clinical culture and snowballing action within the health service.

conclusionsWe identified mechanisms of how co-design processes relate to experiences and impacts. Inequalities in power dynamics are inescapable but can be successfully navigated by building a sense of partnership and collaboration. Crucially, our findings emphasised the intrinsic value of including people with Lived/Living Experience of mental illness in research which directly impacts them. LIVED EXPERIENCE OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Two co-authors with Lived/Living Experience contributed directly to this article, one of whom is the first co-author and co-led the research from initial conceptualisation and funding acquisition. Findings were shared with all participants, as well as with a wider group of Lived/Living Experience representatives and healthcare professionals, who informed interpretation and dissemination.

Indexed as

EmpowermentHealth PersonnelMental DisordersResearch PersonnelAustraliaFocus GroupsHumansQualitative Researchco‐designhealth equitymental healthpsychiatryqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42878206
PMCPMC13670414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.