ArticleJournal of neuromuscular diseases2026
The cognitive-behavioral missing link in myotonic dystrophy type 1: Rethinking social cognition assessment.
Article in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundMyotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is associated with central nervous system involvement and cognitive-behavioral alterations, including deficits in social cognition. However, standard neuropsychological assessments based on accuracy may underestimate clinically relevant dysfunction.ObjectivesTo determine whether task completion times provide a more sensitive index of social-cognitive performance than accuracy-based metrics in DM1.MethodsThirty-three individuals with genetically confirmed DM1 and 40 healthy controls completed the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) and the Story-Based Empathy Test (SET). Both accuracy and task completion times were analyzed. Executive functions and processing speed were evaluated using standard neuropsychological measures. Group comparisons and regression analyses were performed adjusting for age, education, and executive performance.ResultsDM1 patients showed different patterns for accuracy and completion time across social-cognitive tasks. RMET accuracy was reduced, whereas SET accuracy was comparable between groups. In contrast, completion times were consistently prolonged across all social-cognition tasks in DM1. These differences remained significant after controlling for executive function. SET completion time showed stronger discriminative performance than SET accuracy measures, whereas RMET completion time and accuracy showed comparable discriminative performance.ConclusionsSocial cognition in DM1 is characterized by prolonged completion times, while accuracy is relatively preserved on several measures. This discrepancy suggests that conventional accuracy-based assessments may not fully capture subtle differences in social-cognitive performance. Temporal metrics may reveal aspects of social cognition performance not detected by accuracy-based assessments alone and contribute to a more comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42878154What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.