ReviewAnimal models and experimental medicine2026
Animal models of anemia of inflammation: Methodological advances, limitations, and translational applications.
Review in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anemia of inflammation (AI) represents one of the most prevalent secondary anemias in clinical practice, frequently complicating a wide spectrum of chronic inflammatory diseases. Given its highly heterogeneous etiology and complex pathophysiological mechanisms, the establishment of rational and high-fidelity animal models is vital for elucidating the core mechanisms of AI and optimizing clinical diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. This narrative review provides a structured categorization of current AI animal models into three major paradigms: sterile inflammation models, disease-specific models, and genetically engineered models. We provide an in-depth comparative analysis of their underlying modeling principles, methodological protocols, and characteristic phenotypic profiles, while comprehensively evaluating their respective translational advantages and intrinsic limitations. Furthermore, we discuss the prospective applications of these models in deciphering pathomechanisms, validating therapeutic targets, and developing interventional strategies. To enhance reproducibility and translational relevance, we propose a streamlined phenotyping panel and a model selection framework. The precise selection and rational application of these tailored models will contribute to improved reliability of fundamental AI research and accelerate its translational progression from bench to bedside.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.