ArticleThe plant genome2026
Genome evolution of Mediterranean olives following DNA repeats diversification.
Article in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The olive tree (Olea europaea L. subsp. europaea) is one of the most representative perennial crops of the Mediterranean Basin, yet the genomic processes underlying its domestication and diversification remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated repeatome variation across 20 accessions, including 11 wild oleasters and nine cultivated varieties, using comparative clustering of high-throughput sequencing data, complemented by structural analyses of transposable elements (TEs) and tandem repeats (TRs). Repetitive DNA accounts for about 54% of the olive genomes and is composed primarily of long terminal repeat retrotransposons (LTR-REs) and TRs. Comparative analyses revealed lineage-specific differences in LTR-REs between wild and cultivated genotypes, while TRs exhibited higher abundances and greater variability in oleasters for some families (e.g., Oe-80 and Oe-178), reinforcing the view that TRs evolve rapidly and largely independently in olive. We also identified a new TR (Oe-155) and confirmed its distinct monomer sequence and chromosomal organization, suggesting that this subfamily is differentiating from TRs Oe-218 and Oe-80. To refine TE dynamics, we surveyed full-length elements in two reference assemblies (cv. Leccino and a wild sylvestris genotype). Leccino is enriched in intact LTR-REs, whereas sylvestris harbored more full-length Class II DNA transposons. Additionally, the patterns of TE-gene proximity vary significantly between them. Dating of full-length LTR-RE insertions revealed that most RE activity predates domestication, with only a small fraction of very recent insertions. These results highlight repetitive DNA as a major contributor to genome diversification in olive and provide a foundation for integrating repeatome variation with demographic history, introgression, and clonal propagation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.