Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42878118›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2026

Genome evolution of Mediterranean olives following DNA repeats diversification.

Flavia Mascagni, Samuel Simoni, Gabriele Usai, Alexis Ryo, Marco Castellacci, Ugo Rogo, Marilena Ceccarelli, Luciana Baldoni, Tommaso Giordani, Lucia Natali and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Flavia MascagniDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9747-8040
Samuel SimoniDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Gabriele UsaiDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Alexis RyoCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse INP, Université Toulouse 3-Paul Sabatier (UT3), Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4740-6506
Marco CastellacciDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Ugo RogoDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0819-7054
Marilena CeccarelliDepartment of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Luciana BaldoniDepartment of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Tommaso GiordaniDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Lucia NataliDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Andrea CavalliniDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Guillaume BesnardCentre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, IRD, Toulouse INP, Université Toulouse 3-Paul Sabatier (UT3), Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2275-6012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The olive tree (Olea europaea L. subsp. europaea) is one of the most representative perennial crops of the Mediterranean Basin, yet the genomic processes underlying its domestication and diversification remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated repeatome variation across 20 accessions, including 11 wild oleasters and nine cultivated varieties, using comparative clustering of high-throughput sequencing data, complemented by structural analyses of transposable elements (TEs) and tandem repeats (TRs). Repetitive DNA accounts for about 54% of the olive genomes and is composed primarily of long terminal repeat retrotransposons (LTR-REs) and TRs. Comparative analyses revealed lineage-specific differences in LTR-REs between wild and cultivated genotypes, while TRs exhibited higher abundances and greater variability in oleasters for some families (e.g., Oe-80 and Oe-178), reinforcing the view that TRs evolve rapidly and largely independently in olive. We also identified a new TR (Oe-155) and confirmed its distinct monomer sequence and chromosomal organization, suggesting that this subfamily is differentiating from TRs Oe-218 and Oe-80. To refine TE dynamics, we surveyed full-length elements in two reference assemblies (cv. Leccino and a wild sylvestris genotype). Leccino is enriched in intact LTR-REs, whereas sylvestris harbored more full-length Class II DNA transposons. Additionally, the patterns of TE-gene proximity vary significantly between them. Dating of full-length LTR-RE insertions revealed that most RE activity predates domestication, with only a small fraction of very recent insertions. These results highlight repetitive DNA as a major contributor to genome diversification in olive and provide a foundation for integrating repeatome variation with demographic history, introgression, and clonal propagation.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, PlantOleaRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidDNA, PlantDNA Transposable ElementsGenetic VariationMediterranean RegionPhylogenyRetroelementsTandem Repeat SequencesTerminal Repeat SequencesDNA, PlantDNA Transposable ElementsRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID42878118
PMCPMC13670204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.