ArticleClinical cardiology2026
Diagnostic Performance of a Deep Learning Model Using Phonocardiogram and Single-Lead ECG Signals for Detecting Moderate-or-Greater Aortic Stenosis: Multicenter External Validation.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundValvular heart disease, particularly aortic stenosis (AS), often remains asymptomatic until advanced stages, making early detection challenging. Although cardiac auscultation is a traditional screening tool, its diagnostic accuracy is limited. We aimed to externally validate a deep learning-based model (eAS model) using phonocardiogram (PCG) and single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) signals to detect moderate-or-greater AS.
methodsPCG and ECG recordings were acquired using a PCG device (Cardio-EGG). Transthoracic echocardiography served as the reference standard. The external validation cohort consisted of 951 patients from 3 medical institutions, including 70 with moderate-or-greater AS. The primary outcome was sensitivity for detecting moderate-or-greater AS; secondary outcomes included the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios (LR).
resultsThe external validation cohort (n = 951, median age 73 years, male 65%) exhibited more advanced valvular disease than the training/development cohort. The eAS model achieved an AUROC of 0.9632 (95% CI: 0.9471-0.9774). Using the pre-determined threshold, sensitivity was 92.9% and specificity 87.9%, yielding a positive LR of 7.65 and negative LR of 0.08. Model-derived probabilities showed strong associations with echocardiographic measures of AS severity (adjusted R
conclusionThe eAS model demonstrated high diagnostic performance for detecting moderate-or-greater AS in a multicenter external validation cohort. AI-based PCG/ECG analysis may support the decision to refer patients from auscultation to echocardiography for AS evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.