Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42878076›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2026

Selective estrogen receptor degraders and their effect on the breast cancer immune microenvironment.

Kristen S Young, Sean W Fanning

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristen S Young
Sean W Fanning

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One in eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime. Most breast cancers express estrogen receptor α (ERα) and depend on its signaling, which promotes tumor growth, survival, and metastatic spread through hormone-dependent transcriptional reprogramming. Selective estrogen receptor degraders/downregulators (SERDs), such as fulvestrant (faslodex), which was FDA approved in 2002, are second-line endocrine therapies for the treatment of advanced metastatic disease. Tumors containing activating hotspot mutations in ESR1 (the gene encoding ERα) retain some sensitivity to fulvestrant but require higher doses to achieve inhibition of the mutant receptor. Substantial efforts to develop next-generation SERDs with improved pharmacology over fulvestrant have led to the FDA approval of the first-in-class orally available SERD elacestrant (Orserdu), followed by imlunestrant (Inluriyo), and the anticipated approval of several more therapies. Excitingly, recent studies show that in addition to their previously described antitumoral mechanisms, SERDs also act by increasing antitumor immunity. In this Review, we detail the current SERD clinical landscape and our emerging understanding of the interplay among SERDs, breast cancer cells, and the tumor immune microenvironment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEstrogen Receptor alphaSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsFemaleFulvestrantHumansESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaFulvestrantSelective Estrogen Receptor Modulators

Identifiers

PMID42878076
PMCPMC13668616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.