ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2026
Multi-predator feeding aggregations: understanding dynamic communities through functional niches and demographic analysis tools.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-predator feeding aggregations (MPFAs) are ocean events whereby two or more species forage on the same or co-occurring prey. Such communities are dynamic, with community structure reflecting the connections between species and the benefits and costs of associations. The analysis of MPFAs provides an overview of ecosystem health, with social networks reflecting prey and available resources. Demographic analyses of MPFAs can act as process-based indicators of community responses to rapid change. To understand complex community dynamics, we identified community types in MPFAs using hierarchical clustering and determined the social associations and roles of the different species present. We collected data on 179 MPFA events, recording 55.4 hours of behavioural observations from 33 843 individuals belonging to 19 seabird and three cetacean species in the Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand. Eight MPFA community types were identified, representing planktivorous, scavenger or polytrophic aggregations. Seabird-cetacean and seabird-seabird associations dominated species associations. We interpret the species' roles by combining our observations of behavioural states with knowledge from the literature. The study of marine MPFAs offers a community-level perspective for understanding community dynamics and food-web organization under future ecosystem changes. Using social network analyses, we advance the understanding of species interconnectedness to better inform ecosystem-based conservation management. This article is part of the theme issue 'Multi-predator feeding aggregations in the pelagic waters'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.