ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2026
Interactions between multi-species marine predator aggregations and the energy landscape.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interactions between multi-species marine predator aggregations and the energy landscape.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-species predator aggregations can be found in both coastal and pelagic ecosystems, forming for both foraging and refuging (resting) purposes. The energy landscape represents the power costs required to move through or reside within a habitat. As species may differ in their morphology, buoyancy and length, there may be species-specific heterogeneity in their energy landscapes. Here, we highlight how the energy landscape may influence the small-scale distribution of predators within an aggregation and potentially their ability to forage. We focus on negatively buoyant predators, such as sharks, which can reduce their metabolic costs by swimming in upwelling currents. We develop a biomechanical model to show how shark length and buoyancy alter the energetic benefit sharks obtain from swimming in upwelling currents. We provide evidence of small-scale spatial separation between shark species within a French Polynesian channel, which may be related to species exploiting optimal energetic environments. Second, we show how the energy landscape influences patch residence times in foraging predators and how this may differ between species. For instance, different species within a multi-species foraging aggregation may quit the patch at different prey densities. Overall, the energy landscape may help to drive the distribution of species within aggregations or even inter-species patterns of assortativity. This article is part of the theme issue 'Multi-predator feeding aggregations in the pelagic'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.