ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2026
Agonistic interactions and vocalizations among Procellariiformes in multi-species feeding aggregations, observed through bird-borne cameras.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marine predators frequently aggregate at food sources, where interactions can range from cooperative group hunting to interference competition for resources. To investigate interactions at feeding aggregations among procellariiforms, we equipped wandering albatrosses Diomedea exulans with video cameras, collecting 43 hours of footage from 22 individuals. Cameras from eight birds recorded feeding aggregations, capturing a total of 62 minutes of footage (2.7% of observations). All events involved multiple species, including other wandering albatrosses, sooty albatrosses Phoebetria spp., giant petrels Macronectes spp., white-chinned petrels Procellaria aequinoctialis and smaller petrels (prions Pachyptila spp., blue petrels Halobaena caerulea, gadfly petrels Pterodroma spp. and storm petrels Oceanitidae). As in terrestrial bird assemblages, access to food was largely regulated by the size of competing individuals. The presence of other wandering albatrosses influenced interactions, with agonistic interactions in multi-species associations (intimidation postures, strikes and fights) observed only in events involving more than one wandering albatross (four of eight events). These interactions were accompanied by vocalizations. We identified five types of vocalizations from four individuals based on acoustic structure (n = 84 vocalizations). Intimidation postures were frequently accompanied by modulated vocalizations, indicating a combined visual-acoustic threat display. High-pitched screams, though rare, were also associated with agonistic interactions. These results contribute to a better understanding of foraging ecology and resource access in scavenging seabirds. This article is part of the theme issue 'Multi-predator feeding aggregations in pelagic waters'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.