Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42878041›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2026

Agonistic interactions and vocalizations among Procellariiformes in multi-species feeding aggregations, observed through bird-borne cameras.

Andréa Thiebault, Isabelle Charrier, Maëlle Amiot, Peter G Ryan, Pierre Pistorius, Stefan Schoombie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andréa ThiebaultInstitut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay (NeuroPSI), CNRS UMR 9197, Université Paris-Saclay , 91400 Saclay, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9585-1083
Isabelle CharrierInstitut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay (NeuroPSI), CNRS UMR 9197, Université Paris-Saclay , 91400 Saclay, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4873-2342
Maëlle AmiotInstitut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay (NeuroPSI), CNRS UMR 9197, Université Paris-Saclay , 91400 Saclay, France.
Peter G RyanFitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town , Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.
Pierre PistoriusMarine Apex Predator Research Unit, Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Nelson Mandela University , Gqeberha 6001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6561-7069
Stefan SchoombieDepartment of Statistical Sciences, Centre for Statistics in Ecology, the Environment and Conservation (SEEC), University of Cape Town , Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6566-0443

Funding

FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology Centre of ExcellenceSouth African National Antarctic ProgrammeSouth African National Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine predators frequently aggregate at food sources, where interactions can range from cooperative group hunting to interference competition for resources. To investigate interactions at feeding aggregations among procellariiforms, we equipped wandering albatrosses Diomedea exulans with video cameras, collecting 43 hours of footage from 22 individuals. Cameras from eight birds recorded feeding aggregations, capturing a total of 62 minutes of footage (2.7% of observations). All events involved multiple species, including other wandering albatrosses, sooty albatrosses Phoebetria spp., giant petrels Macronectes spp., white-chinned petrels Procellaria aequinoctialis and smaller petrels (prions Pachyptila spp., blue petrels Halobaena caerulea, gadfly petrels Pterodroma spp. and storm petrels Oceanitidae). As in terrestrial bird assemblages, access to food was largely regulated by the size of competing individuals. The presence of other wandering albatrosses influenced interactions, with agonistic interactions in multi-species associations (intimidation postures, strikes and fights) observed only in events involving more than one wandering albatross (four of eight events). These interactions were accompanied by vocalizations. We identified five types of vocalizations from four individuals based on acoustic structure (n = 84 vocalizations). Intimidation postures were frequently accompanied by modulated vocalizations, indicating a combined visual-acoustic threat display. High-pitched screams, though rare, were also associated with agonistic interactions. These results contribute to a better understanding of foraging ecology and resource access in scavenging seabirds. This article is part of the theme issue 'Multi-predator feeding aggregations in pelagic waters'.

Indexed as

Agonistic BehaviorBirdsFeeding BehaviorVocalization, AnimalAnimalsVideo RecordingalbatrossbioacousticsbiologgingcompetitionethologypetrelPrince Edward Islandsprionresource sharingvisual display

Identifiers

PMID42878041
PMCPMC13670075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.