ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2026
Coevolutionary attack and avoidance strategies in predators and grouping prey.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The formation of groups by prey is one of the most widespread evolutionary responses to predation. However, while the anti-predation benefits provided to prey within groups have been extensively explored in the literature, the subsequent response of predators to grouping behaviour has lacked attention. In particular, what strategies predators use to attack grouping prey, and whether predation strategies have evolved to explicitly exploit the behaviour of prey groups, remains underexplored. In this review, we discuss the behavioural strategies predators have evolved to counteract the collective defences of prey groups, and in some cases capitalize on the prey's grouping behaviour. Specifically, we focus on the different strategies predators use to break apart and disrupt groups, while also exploring how predators capitalize on cohesion and coordinated movement to increase the likelihood of a successful attack. Overall, this review challenges the assumption that grouping is universally advantageous for prey, showing that predators have evolved a variety of successful strategies to overcome, and even exploit, grouping prey. This article is part of the theme issue 'Multi-predator feeding aggregations in the pelagic waters'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.