Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42877986›Full record

ArticleBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2026

Telepharmacological Consultation for Polypharmacy Management in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study of General Practitioners' Experiences With Cross-Sectoral Coordination.

Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel Pilsgaard HenriksenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1303-6195

Funding

Odense University Hospital Innovation Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The telepharmacological outpatient clinic (TPOC) is a hospital service in which clinical pharmacologists and clinical pharmacists review a patient's full medication regimen and hospital record, then discuss it with the referring general practitioner (GP) by video conference. Seven GPs in the Region of Southern Denmark who had used or been introduced to the service were interviewed to explore how it was used and what prevented wider use. Interviews were semi-structured and analysed thematically. GPs described practices organised around single diagnoses, with no separate pathway for patients who are difficult because they are complex. This was the setting the service entered. Four themes were identified. Whether the service was used depended on integration into existing clinical software. Its value reached past the referred patient, as GPs applied what they had learned to patients never referred. GPs described a coordination gap for patients attending several outpatient clinics, where no clinician held an overview of the whole treatment. They wanted the intensity of the service matched to the complexity of the case. GPs who wanted to refer more often pointed to awareness and time pressure, not to doubts about the service. Uptake appears to depend on workflow integration.

Indexed as

General PractitionersPolypharmacyPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationRemote ConsultationTelemedicineAttitude of Health PersonnelDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleQualitative Researchcross‐sectoral collaborationgeneral practicemultimorbiditypolypharmacytelepharmacology

Identifiers

PMID42877986
PMCPMC13670133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.