ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Credit Where Credit's Due: Gynecology Paves the Way for MIS (Minimally Invasive Surgery).
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of modern-day minimally invasive surgery (MIS) marked a turning point in the history of medicine, driving one of the sharpest declines in surgical mortality and morbidity ever recorded-standing alongside antisepsis and antibiotics as one of the most consequential life-saving advances in medical history. By averting an estimated 10 to 20 million surgical deaths and sparing over 1 billion patients the severe, long-term disabilities once inherent to large-incision approaches, MIS transformed surgical practice across all disciplines within a single generation. As a first-person historical account and companion piece to our systematic outcomes review, this Clinical Opinion reconstructs the lived experience of that paradigm shift: from the haunting realities of 1970s open laparotomy to Camran Nezhat's pioneering transition from eyepiece laparoscopy to monitor-guided operative endoscopy. The author reflects on the personal motivations, technological improvisations, and multidisciplinary collaborations that expanded videoendoscopy beyond diagnostics into complex operative interventions, as well as the fierce institutional resistance that nearly extinguished the movement. Beyond its technical achievements-including dramatic reductions in perioperative blood loss, multiunit transfusions, infections, and hospital stays-MIS catalyzed a fundamental reimagining of surgery itself. It inverted two centuries of surgical doctrine, replacing the belief that "the bigger the incision, the better the surgeon" with a new ethos centered on shared visualization, organ preservation, and pathology-directed precision. Ultimately, this narrative highlights the cost of innovation, the role of patients as the true drivers of progress, and the ongoing obligation to ensure equitable global access to minimally invasive and robotic-assisted care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.