ArticleCase reports in oncology
Pseudoprogression after Axi-cel in Primary Refractory PMBCL following Failed Bridging: Case Report and Management Considerations.
Article in Case reports in oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a rare, aggressive lymphoma with limited therapeutic options in the relapsed or refractory setting. Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has shown promising efficacy; yet treatment decisions remain challenging in patients with rapidly progressive disease and high tumor burden. Case presentation: We report a 29-year-old woman with primary chemotherapy-refractory PMBCL who developed fulminant extranodal disease progression despite radiotherapy and systemic bridging therapy prior to planned axi-cel infusion. Following CAR T-cell therapy, she experienced grade 2 cytokine release syndrome and grade 3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, alongside clinical deterioration and radiological findings suggestive of disease progression. Notably, pronounced CAR T-cell expansion preceded biochemical improvement and subsequent radiological tumor regression, consistent with pseudoprogression rather than true treatment failure. Conclusion: Despite initially misleading clinical and imaging findings in the context of suboptimal baseline conditions, the patient achieved a durable complete remission and remains disease-free 23 months post-CAR T-cell therapy, with excellent quality of life. This case highlights the critical importance of recognizing immune-mediated flare phenomena to guide clinical decision-making and avoid premature treatment discontinuation or misclassification of therapeutic failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.