ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
Assessment of occupational risks in a fuel analysis laboratory.
Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Occupational exposure to fuels and their chemical components represents a significant challenge to workers' health, particularly in laboratory settings where these substances are handled directly and frequently. Although the toxic effects of these compounds have been widely described in the literature, studies systematically assessing the health profile of workers in fuel analysis laboratories remain scarce, particularly in Brazil. Objectives: To analyze occupational risks in a fuel analysis laboratory in the city of São Paulo by describing the workers' health profile, the occurrence of signs and symptoms, and their possible relationship with chemical exposures, as well as to discuss the implications of the findings for improving preventive management practices in compliance with current regulatory standards. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, observational, descriptive study with a quantitative approach. A customized questionnaire, a customized Risk Recognition Form, an informed consent form, and the Advanced REACH Tool, version 1.5, were used. Results: The estimates obtained using the ART 1.5 tool, even under conservative assumptions, remained below the limits established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists and the values reported in an institutional document. Conclusions: Under the modeled conditions, the exposures estimated using the Advanced REACH Tool 1.5 remained below the established occupational exposure limits. Because this is a predictive tool, its results do not replace direct environmental monitoring. The study also identified opportunities to improve risk management and the laboratory infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.