Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42877863›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Analyzing Test Items Using Difficulty Index and Discrimination Index for Evaluating Postgraduate Medical Residents.

Bijoy Kumer Paul, Khandakar Fatema, Taslima Chowdhury, Kamrun Nahar, Jannatul Saki, Marium Salwa, M Atiqul Haque

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bijoy Kumer PaulDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, BGD.
Khandakar FatemaDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, BGD.
Taslima ChowdhuryDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, BGD.
Kamrun NaharDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, BGD.
Jannatul SakiDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, BGD.
Marium SalwaDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, BGD.
M Atiqul HaqueDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, BGD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background This study aimed to analyze objective questions used to evaluate Phase B residents in the Basics of Medical Education course in Bangladesh, focusing on standardizing test questions and identifying areas for improvement based on Difficulty Index (DIF I) and Discrimination Index (DI). Methodology In November 2022, 148 Phase B residents were examined by an internal assessment on the Basics of Medical Education. The assessment comprised 50 objective questions, including true/false (T/F) statements and fill-in-the-gap exercises. Each correct answer received one mark. Following the assessment, item analysis was performed for validation, with data analysis conducted using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA). Results Out of 30 T/F statements, 40% were considered good/acceptable, with a mean DIF I of 76.17 and a standard deviation (SD) of 20.42; 60% were considered too easy. The overall mean (SD) DI for all T/F statements was 0.18 (0.13), with half displaying acceptable to excellent discriminatory capacity. For the 20 fill-in-the-blank statements, 40% were considered acceptable, with a mean (SD) DIF I of 64.80 (20.70) and a DI of 0.32 (0.18), indicating that 75% of these items had a good to excellent quality level. Conclusion Fill-in-the-blank statements demonstrated exceptional discriminatory capabilities, but half of the T/F statements require significant refinement to enhance their quality.

Indexed as

assessmentbangladeshdifficulty indexdiscrimination indexmedical education

Identifiers

PMID42877863
PMCPMC13665971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.