ArticleEuropean journal of case reports in internal medicine2026
Should the Traditional Algorithm for Syphilis Screening be Abandoned? Neurosyphilis Presenting as Limbic Encephalitis: A Prozone False-Negative RPR Missed by an RPR-Only Initial Screen.
Article in European journal of case reports in internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neurosyphilis is a treatable mimic of viral and autoimmune limbic encephalitis. The prozone phenomenon-antibody excess preventing the antigen-antibody lattice-can render an undiluted non-treponemal test such as the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test falsely negative, with reactivity restored on dilution. Case description: A 37-year-old man presented with seizures and rapidly progressive limbic encephalitis; Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences showed hyperintensities in the amygdalae, periventricular regions, left insula and left putamen. On admission, the possibility of a sexually transmitted infection was considered, but only an RPR was requested, and it was negative. When the encephalitis failed to respond to empirical antiviral, antibacterial and corticosteroid therapy, a Discussion: With an RPR-only screen, the non-treponemal/treponemal discordance that typically signals a prozone never arose, so the false negative was accepted at face value; the delay reflected the prozone compounded by the initial testing strategy. Because empirical ceftriaxone active against Conclusion: When syphilis is suspected, a negative undiluted RPR does not exclude it; pairing a treponemal test with the RPR-or adopting a treponemal-first screening strategy-guards against prozone-related false negatives. LEARNING POINTS: When a sexually transmitted infection is being considered, obtain a careful, respectful sexual history and request non-treponemal and treponemal tests together; a rapid plasma reagin -only screen cannot reveal the non-treponemal/treponemal discordance that signals a prozone false negative. A treponemal-first (reverse-sequence) algorithm avoids this particular pitfall.A negative undiluted RPR does not exclude syphilis: the prozone phenomenon occurs even at low-to-moderate titres and in human immunodeficiency virus-negative patients, so serial dilution should be requested when clinical suspicion is high.Neurosyphilis is a treatable mimic of limbic encephalitis; outcome depends on prompt effective therapy, and including a treponemal-active agent (e.g. ceftriaxone) in empirical meningoencephalitis coverage may limit harm from diagnostic delay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.