ArticleEuropean journal of case reports in internal medicine2026
False-Positive HIV Screening in New-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Presenting with Polyserositis and Lupus Nephritis.
Article in European journal of case reports in internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
False-reactive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening can occur in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and may delay recognition of the underlying autoimmune disease. A 23-year-old woman presented with weight loss, polyserositis and nephrotic-range proteinuria. Her HIV antigen/antibody screen was reactive, but supplemental testing did not confirm HIV infection. Lupus serologies, hypocomplementemia and kidney biopsy established SLE with mixed proliferative and membranous lupus nephritis. Recurrent pleural and progressive pericardial effusions required immunosuppression, pericardial drainage, a surgical window and pleural decortication. The reactive HIV screen initially favoured an infectious diagnosis; however, proteinuria, haematuria and low complement levels suggested immune-complex disease. This illustrates the risk of diagnostic anchoring on a preliminary screening result. A reactive HIV screen is not diagnostic. Prompt supplemental testing and parallel evaluation for autoimmune disease can prevent delayed diagnosis of SLE. LEARNING POINTS: A reactive HIV screening assay is preliminary, not diagnostic; in patients with autoimmune features, prompt supplemental testing is essential because systemic lupus erythematosus can cause false reactivity.A reactive HIV screen may create diagnostic anchoring when weight loss, serosal effusions and renal abnormalities coexist; discordant clinical and laboratory findings should trigger reassessment rather than premature attribution to HIV.In a young patient with unexplained polyserositis, proteinuria and glomerular haematuria, early lupus serology, complement testing and careful family history can expedite the diagnosis of severe lupus nephritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.