Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42877805›Full record

ReviewDementia & neuropsychologia2026

Therapeutic arts in Alzheimer disease: a brief review of evidence and mechanisms.

Sristi Chakraborty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dementia & neuropsychologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sristi ChakrabortyManipal Academy of Higher Education, Kasturba Medical College - Manipal Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1329-1420

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As pharmacological treatments for Alzheimer disease (AD) offer only modest symptomatic improvement, non-pharmacological interventions - including therapeutic arts - are increasingly being explored for their potential to enhance cognitive, emotional, and psychosocial well-being in individuals with AD. This mini-narrative review aimed to summarize the various neurobiological mechanisms through which therapeutic arts impact progression of AD. It also compares the findings, clinical benefits, and changing attitudes of patients and caregivers toward therapeutic arts, such as music therapy, visual arts, dance/movement therapy, and creative expression, before and after 2000. With robust studies and advanced technologies, there is growing evidence that integrating structured arts-based programs into dementia care may provide cost-effective solutions to improve patient outcomes and slow functional decline in patients with AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseArt TherapyCognitive DysfunctionDance TherapyMusic Therapy

Identifiers

PMID42877805
PMCPMC13666344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.