ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026
Novel Modified Water Balloon for Mini-Probe Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Esophageal and Gastric Submucosal Lesions: A Dual-Center Retrospective Study.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is commonly used for preoperative diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions (SMLs), but it remains technically challenging due to rapid water drainage and the risk of aspiration. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel modified water balloon (WB) for mini-probe EUS compared to the conventional water immersion (WI) method. Methods: In this double-center retrospective study, 136 consecutive patients with SMLs were evaluated using novel WB and conventional WI techniques through mini-probe EUS. Notably, sedation was primarily applied in the WB group due to the fluid-confining design, which may serve as a potential confounding factor. The primary outcome, diagnostic accuracy rate, and the secondary outcomes including image quality, procedure time, and safety profile were compared between the two groups. Results: The overall diagnostic accuracy rate in the novel WB group was significantly higher than that in the conventional WI group (84.4% vs 69.4%, P = 0.04). The novel WB group achieved a higher proportion of high-quality images (P < 0.05) and significantly shorter mean procedure times (P < 0.01). No aspiration events occurred in the novel WB group, despite some cases involving deep sedation. Overall minor complication rates did not differ significantly between two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The novel modified WB technique provides a practical and cost-effective acoustic window for esophageal mini-probe EUS, demonstrating superior procedural efficiency and image quality. Although limited by its retrospective design and variations in sedation protocols, this technique shows potential in mitigating aspiration risks under sedation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.