ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2026
Sport-related entheseal adaptation and damage in elite athletes: a cross-sectional ultrasound study.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Entheses, the sites where tendons, ligaments, and joint capsules insert into bone, are highly susceptible to mechanical stress. While enthesitis is a cardinal feature of spondyloarthritis (SpA), repetitive mechanical loading in elite athletes can also induce entheseal changes. High-resolution ultrasound (US) allows for detailed assessment of entheseal inflammation and structural damage. However, the specific impact of sport-specific loading patterns on differentiating physiological entheseal adaptation from early pathology in asymptomatic elite athletes remains a critical area for investigation. Material and methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 87 elite athletes from various sports (athletics, basketball, cycling, golf, handball, climbing, archery) and 49 sedentary controls. Elite status was defined as training > 10 h/week for over 5 years. All participants underwent US evaluation of 20 bilateral entheseal sites. US findings were scored semi-quantitatively (0-3) for inflammation (hypoechogenicity, thickening, power Doppler [PD] signals) and damage (calcifications, erosions, enthesophytes) according to OMERACT definitions. Athletes were grouped by dominant extremity use (upper, lower, or both). Statistical comparisons and linear regression analyses were performed to identify associations between entheseal scores and demographic/training variables. Results: Elite athletes exhibited significantly higher entheseal inflammation and damage scores compared to sedentary controls ( Conclusions: Sport-specific mechanical loading is strongly associated with localized entheseal changes detectable by US in elite athletes. These findings underscore the importance of contextualizing US results within an athlete's specific sport and loading history to distinguish between subclinical entheseal adaptation and true pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.