ArticleBMJ public health2026
Implementing a peer learning strategy for health systems strengthening in Ghana: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Primary healthcare, through community-based care provision, is a pathway to achieving universal health coverage (UHC). Ghana adopted the Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) initiative as a national health strategy to drive UHC. Challenges with the national scale-up led to strengthening CHPS in the Upper East Region through the Ghana Essential Health Interventions Programme (GEHIP). Subsequently, CHPS+ was implemented to further strengthen CHPS and sustain the gains of GEHIP. CHPS+ adopted a peer learning implementation strategy through health personnel visits to Upper East. This study reports on health personnel's experiences with the CHPS+ peer learning exchange and their perceptions of how lessons from the exchange informed healthcare services. Methods: This qualitative systems appraisal used a descriptive design comprising in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Study participants consisted of 51 health personnel, including district health management team members, subdistrict leaders and community health officers, recruited from four systems learning districts. The data were analysed thematically, both manually and using the Dedoose software. Results: Peer-to-peer learning strengthened CHPS implementation by improving subdistrict supervision, standardising monitoring and feedback, enhancing community engagement and supporting the use of practical tools such as community health action plans, movement wheels, community maps and profiling charts. Greater involvement of chiefs, community health committees, volunteers and local government actors was reported after the exchange. However, implementation remained uneven, with some districts reporting concrete changes and others describing early-stage actions. Continued mentorship, adequate resources, routine monitoring and stronger local leadership were recommended to sustain and institutionalise the lessons learnt. Conclusions: Peer-to-peer learning offers a feasible strategy for strengthening CHPS+ implementation across districts by translating established practices into locally adaptable action. Its long-term value will depend on institutionalising follow-up mentorship, ensuring adequate resources and embedding shared learning within routine health-system structures to strengthen primary healthcare in Ghana.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.