ReviewCureus2026
Extensor Mechanism Reconstruction Following Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with concomitant extensor mechanism disruption (EMD) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a rare but devastating complication associated with severe functional loss and limited limb-salvage options. Although several reconstructive strategies have been described, outcomes in the infected setting remain poorly defined. We conducted a systematic review, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, to evaluate the reconstructive approaches and reported clinical outcomes for EMD in the setting of PJI after TKA. PubMed and Semantic Scholar were searched from inception through January 31, 2026, for studies reporting outcomes after extensor mechanism reconstruction in patients with PJI following TKA; primary clinical studies and systematic reviews were eligible. Extracted variables included reconstructive technique, failure and reinfection rates, functional outcomes, and follow-up duration. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising three primary clinical studies and eight systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Reported failure rates varied across the included literature, and no formal comparison established superiority or equivalence of allograft versus synthetic mesh reconstruction. Reconstruction was associated with meaningful functional improvement: postoperative Knee Society Scores frequently exceeded 70 points, extensor lag typically improved to less than 10°, and postoperative flexion generally ranged from 95° to 110°. Recurrent infection remained an important cause of treatment failure in the PJI-specific literature. Extensor mechanism reconstruction after PJI complicating TKA remains a complex limb-salvage procedure with a guarded prognosis; reported outcomes appear to depend on infection control, soft-tissue quality, and defect-specific reconstructive planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.