ArticleBMJ public health2026
General practitioners' willingness and perceived barriers and facilitators to 'prescribing' potassium-enriched salt in China: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Replacing regular salt with potassium-enriched salt has been identified as a promising strategy to reduce blood pressure and prevent cardiovascular diseases. However, its implementation in clinical practice remains limited. To address this implementation gap, this study aimed to examine general practitioners' (GPs) self-reported awareness, perceptions, personal use and willingness to 'prescribe' potassium-enriched salt and to identify perceived barriers and facilitators to its future implementation in routine primary care. Methods: This explanatory sequential mixed methods study combined a cross-sectional survey of GPs across mainland China with semi-structured qualitative interviews with GPs and patients. Key results: A total of 7134 survey responses were received, of which 7116 were included in the quantitative analysis after 18 internally inconsistent responses were excluded. The qualitative phase included 51 participants (19 GPs and 32 patients). Among the 7116 GPs included in the quantitative analysis, 82.6% reported having heard of potassium-enriched salt, 48.6% reported currently using it, 78.7% perceived it to be safe and 79.5% expressed willingness to 'prescribe' it. Among those unwilling to 'prescribe' it (n=1456), the most frequently reported reason was perceived low patient awareness (44.7%). Qualitative findings indicated that willingness was influenced by uncertainty about appropriate use, concerns about potential safety risks, the lack of clinical guidelines and perceived gaps in understanding of long-term benefits and risks. Consumer adoption was influenced by taste preferences, cost and limited awareness of potential health benefits. Strong GP-patient trust emerged as a key facilitator. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential role of GPs in recommending potassium-enriched salt. Future implementation will require addressing gaps in awareness and understanding, providing formal training and developing standardised guidelines to support safer and more consistent implementation in routine primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.