ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Building a framework for successful transition from pediatric to adult healthcare in Down syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adults with Down syndrome (DS) increasingly require structured transition from pediatric to adult healthcare, yet disease-specific guidance remains limited. Methods: We reviewed current evidence and combined it with the multidisciplinary clinical experience of the Belgian National Scientific Board for Down Syndrome to identify barriers and propose practical recommendations. Results: Transition in DS is challenged by intellectual disability, multimorbidity, fragmented adult care, structural healthcare inequalities, delayed primary care involvement, parental ageing, and poor coordination between medical and social services. We propose a person-centered framework emphasizing early preparation, supported decision-making, multidisciplinary collaboration, early engagement of general practitioners, accessible communication, and integrated medico-social support. Conclusions: Disease-specific transition pathways are needed to improve continuity of care, promote autonomy, and reduce health inequalities. Prospective studies should evaluate transition models and include the perspectives of people with DS and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.