ArticleOsteoporosis and sarcopenia2026
Federated learning for privacy-preserving opportunistic screening of lumbar-spine DXA-defined osteoporotic-level bone mineral density using chest radiographs: A multi-center independent validation study.
Article in Osteoporosis and sarcopenia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) system trained via federated learning for opportunistic screening of lumbar-spine DXA-defined osteoporotic-level bone mineral density (T-score ≤ -2.5) using routine chest X-rays (CXRs) in a multi-center independent validation setting. Methods: A deep learning model was developed via privacy-preserving federated learning on 5943 paired CXR and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examinations and validated on an independent dual-center cohort of 3007 adults undergoing same-day CXR and DXA. Ground truth was a lumbar spine DXA T-score ≤ -2.5. The primary metric was AUROC, alongside sensitivity and specificity. Image-only and clinical-only ablation models were evaluated on the same cohort to disentangle imaging from demographic contributions. Results: Among 3007 validation cases, 200 (6.7%) had a T-score ≤ -2.5. The AI achieved an AUROC of 0.942 (95% CI, 0.923-0.962), with sensitivity of 91.0% and specificity of 82.7%, and performance was preserved across study sites, sexes, and the clinically relevant older stratum (≥60 years). In ablation analysis, the image-only model achieved AUROC 0.931 (95% CI 0.912-0.950) and the clinical-only baseline 0.780 (0.732-0.827); non-overlapping 95% CIs (image-only higher) support an independent imaging contribution beyond demographics. Conclusions: This federated learning-based AI demonstrates high discrimination for identifying lumbar-spine DXA-defined osteoporotic-level bone mineral density (T-score ≤ -2.5) from standard CXRs and shows temporal transportability across two institutions without centralizing raw imaging data. Positioned as a triage adjunct to confirmatory DXA, it offers a scalable, privacy-preserving opportunistic screening solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.