ReviewCureus2026
The Effect of Oral Isotretinoin on Quality of Life in Patients With Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acne vulgaris is a highly prevalent chronic inflammatory skin disorder that can adversely affect psychological well-being, social functioning, and overall quality of life. Oral isotretinoin is widely regarded as an effective treatment for moderate to severe acne, yet its influence on patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes remains incompletely characterized because published studies have reported variable findings. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 recommendations. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched from database inception to April 5, 2026. Eligible studies included patients with acne vulgaris treated with oral isotretinoin and reporting quality-of-life outcomes using validated instruments. Risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions) for non-randomized studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) for the randomized trial. For studies reporting sufficient independent Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) data, pooled effect estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. Fourteen studies with varying designs, settings, and patient populations met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Across studies, oral isotretinoin treatment was generally associated with improved quality of life, with the most consistent benefits observed with dermatology-specific and acne-specific instruments. Four studies contributed sufficient independent data to the quantitative synthesis. Meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in DLQI scores following isotretinoin treatment, corresponding to improved quality of life (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.49, 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.48 to -0.51). Heterogeneity was substantial (I² = 98.1%). In exploratory subgroup analyses, improvements were observed in both mixed-severity and severe or treatment-resistant acne populations, with no statistically significant difference between subgroups. Oral isotretinoin appears to be associated with meaningful improvements in quality of life among patients with acne vulgaris, particularly when assessed using dermatology- or acne-specific instruments. However, the substantial heterogeneity and predominance of non-randomized studies warrant cautious interpretation of the pooled effect. Further well-designed prospective and randomized studies using standardized quality-of-life measures and longer follow-up are needed to better establish the magnitude and durability of these benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.