ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
The late positive component in recognition memory is linked to mnemonic evidence accumulation.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recognising objects from memory requires an integration of sensory and mnemonic information. This process has been theorised to occur via a stochastic evidence accumulation process implemented within the parietal cortex. Recent electroencephalographic (EEG) evidence indicates that the widely studied parietal Late Positive Component (LPC) shows characteristics of such a mnemonic accumulation signal. Here, we formally investigated this hypothesis using generative computational modelling that links a trial-level memory strength variable in the Diffusion Decision Model (DDM) with LPC amplitudes prior to the time of the decision. We recorded EEG from 24 participants making recognition judgements based on either studied or novel words. Each participant completed up to three testing sessions. We replicated recent findings that the LPC ramps up and peaks around the time of the decision and corresponding motor response. LPC amplitudes also covaried with accuracy and response time, as expected of a neural correlate of memory strength. By fitting DDMs to LPC amplitudes and behavioural data using specialised neural network tools, we demonstrate that LPC amplitudes are selectively associated with the rate of evidence accumulation, signifying memory strength. This association was stronger for previously studied words compared to novel words, and strongest at the time window immediately prior to the recognition decision. Our findings, therefore, recast the LPC as a neural signature of mnemonic strength linked to the rate of evidence accumulation during recognition memory decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.