ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Understanding digital diffusion and online decision-making in public health promotion: a sequential mixed-methods study of the violence prevention charter in Canada.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital environments have become important settings for public health promotion, yet dissemination alone does not explain why individuals and organizations choose to adopt and act on public health information. Understanding digital diffusion requires attention to temporal patterns of adoption, the social networks through which information and influence circulate, and the contextual conditions that shape decision-making. This sequential mixed-methods single case study examined the dissemination and voluntary adoption of the Violence Prevention Charter, a principles-based public health initiative in Canada. Website analytics and Bass diffusion modeling characterized temporal patterns of dissemination and adoption. Social Network Analysis examined the relational environment through which information, trust, and influence circulated, while a realist-informed examination of Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations explored the contextual conditions and generative mechanisms influencing participant reasoning and engagement. The complementary findings were integrated and interpreted through a Complex Adaptive Systems framework. Digital engagement demonstrated sustained dissemination and an accelerating pattern of adoption following purposeful promotion. Social Network Analysis identified a cohesive professional network characterized by strong trust relationships, information exchange, and influential connections. Realist-informed analysis identified three principal mechanisms influencing engagement: creation of social good, trust in the source, and influence of colleagues and peers. Adoption decisions were also shaped by competing demands, characteristics of the digital environment, organizational context, and participants' independent assessment of the relevance and credibility of the initiative. The findings suggest that diffusion within digital public health ecosystems is shaped by interactions among communication, trusted social relationships, organizational context, and individual agency. Sequential integration of temporal, relational, and contextual methods provides a useful approach for investigating online decision-making and voluntary adoption, while a Complex Adaptive Systems perspective offers a framework for understanding how these interacting influences contribute to the diffusion of principles-based public health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.